Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2021 (10) TMI 1351 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal directs re-computation of Arm's Length Price for SWD services, emphasizes RPT threshold exclusion. The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the AO/TPO to re-compute the Arm's Length Price (ALP) for the international transaction of rendering ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal directs re-computation of Arm's Length Price for SWD services, emphasizes RPT threshold exclusion.

                          The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the AO/TPO to re-compute the Arm's Length Price (ALP) for the international transaction of rendering Software Development Services (SWD) and the delayed realization of receivables. The Tribunal emphasized the exclusion of companies with high turnovers and the application of a 15% Related Party Transactions (RPT) threshold. The Assessee was granted an opportunity to be heard in the fresh examination of these issues.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Determination of Arm's Length Price (ALP) for Software Development Services (SWD) provided to Associated Enterprises (AEs).
                          2. Choice of comparable companies for determining ALP.
                          3. Exclusion of certain companies based on turnover and related party transactions.
                          4. Treatment of delayed realization of receivables as a separate international transaction.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Determination of Arm's Length Price (ALP) for SWD Services:
                          The Assessee, engaged in providing SWD services to its AE, filed a Transfer Pricing Study (TP Study) using the Transaction Net Margin Method (TNMM) as the Most Appropriate Method (MAM) for determining ALP. The Assessee selected Operating Profit/Operating Cost (OP/OC) as the Profit Level Indicator (PLI). The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) accepted TNMM as the MAM and OP/OC as the PLI but identified additional comparable companies, arriving at a PLI of 24.83%. Consequently, an adjustment of Rs. 2,78,16,697/- was made to the Assessee's total income.

                          2. Choice of Comparable Companies for Determining ALP:
                          The Assessee contested the TPO's choice of comparable companies, arguing that companies with high turnover should be excluded. The Tribunal noted that the Assessee's turnover was Rs. 24,71,71,242/-, while the TPO included companies with turnovers exceeding Rs. 200 Crores. The Tribunal referred to various decisions, including the case of Dell International Services India (P) Ltd. and Autodesk India Pvt. Ltd., which supported excluding companies with significantly higher turnovers. The Tribunal concluded that companies with turnovers exceeding Rs. 200 Crores should be excluded from the list of comparables.

                          3. Exclusion of Certain Companies Based on Turnover and Related Party Transactions:
                          The Tribunal addressed the exclusion of R.S. Software (India) Ltd., whose turnover exceeded Rs. 200 Crores in previous years, by examining Rule 10CA of the Income-tax Rules. It was determined that the profit margins of R.S. Software for earlier years should be ignored due to non-comparability. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the application of a 15% threshold for Related Party Transactions (RPT), following the Karnataka High Court's decision in the case of Yodlee Infotech Pvt. Ltd., leading to the exclusion of R.S. Software due to its 17.52% RPT.

                          4. Treatment of Delayed Realization of Receivables as a Separate International Transaction:
                          The TPO treated delayed realization of receivables as a separate international transaction, applying an interest rate of 4.485% on the average net receivables, resulting in an adjustment of Rs. 50,87,241/-. The Tribunal, considering conflicting decisions on this issue, referred to the amendment to Sec. 92B of the Act and various judicial pronouncements, including the case of Kusum Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. and Techbooks International (P.) Ltd. The Tribunal concluded that delayed realization of receivables constitutes an international transaction and directed the AO/TPO to re-examine the determination of ALP for this transaction, considering the currency in which the loan is to be repaid.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the AO/TPO to re-compute the ALP for the international transaction of rendering SWD services and the delayed realization of receivables, after excluding companies with high turnovers and applying the 15% RPT threshold. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a fresh examination of these issues, providing the Assessee an opportunity to be heard.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found