Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2020 (3) TMI 414 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tax Appeals Decision: Comparables Inclusion, Operating Margin Remand, Section 10A Deductions Upheld, MAT Credit Granted The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals by the Assessee and the Revenue. It upheld the exclusion and inclusion of comparables as directed by the DRP, ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tax Appeals Decision: Comparables Inclusion, Operating Margin Remand, Section 10A Deductions Upheld, MAT Credit Granted

                            The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals by the Assessee and the Revenue. It upheld the exclusion and inclusion of comparables as directed by the DRP, remanded the issue of operating margin computation back to the TPO, upheld the DRP's direction on Section 10A deductions, and directed the AO to grant the correct MAT credit and advance tax adjustments.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Determination of Arm's Length Price (ALP) for Software Development Services (SWD Services).
                            2. Exclusion and inclusion of certain companies as comparables.
                            3. Computation of operating margin and treatment of specific expenses.
                            4. Deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act.
                            5. Granting of MAT credit under Section 115JAA.
                            6. Correct credit for advance tax paid.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Determination of Arm's Length Price (ALP) for SWD Services:
                            The Assessee, engaged in providing SWD services to its affiliates, filed a transfer pricing study using the Transaction Net Margin Method (TNMM) and chose Operating Profit/Operating Cost as the profit level indicator (PLI). The Assessee selected 16 companies as comparables and claimed that its profit margin was within the permissible range. The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO), however, rejected this study and made a TP adjustment of Rs. 4,77,69,560/-. The TPO selected 11 comparables and determined the ALP, leading to a shortfall added to the total income.

                            2. Exclusion and Inclusion of Certain Companies as Comparables:
                            The Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) directed the exclusion of certain companies (ICRA Techno Analytics Ltd., Infosys Technologies Ltd., Tata Elxsi Ltd., Persistent Systems Ltd., Persistent Systems and Solutions Ltd., Thinksoft Global Services Ltd., and R S Software (India) Ltd.) and upheld the inclusion of KALS Information Systems Ltd. The Tribunal upheld the DRP's decision to exclude these companies based on functional dissimilarities and lack of segmental data. The Tribunal also agreed with the Assessee's contention to exclude KALS Information Systems Ltd. due to its involvement in software products and training services.

                            3. Computation of Operating Margin and Treatment of Specific Expenses:
                            The Assessee argued that certain expenses (employee stock compensation and provision for service tax) should not be included in the operating costs. The DRP directed these to be treated as non-operating costs. However, the TPO did not exclude these expenses in the final computation. The Tribunal remanded the issue back to the TPO for fresh consideration to determine the operating profit margin accurately.

                            4. Deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act:
                            The AO reduced communication charges and travel expenditure from the export turnover but not from the total turnover, affecting the deduction under Section 10A. The DRP directed that these expenses should also be reduced from the total turnover, aligning with the Karnataka High Court's decision in CIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd. The Tribunal upheld this direction, confirming it was consistent with the Supreme Court's affirmation in CIT v. HCL Technologies Ltd.

                            5. Granting of MAT Credit under Section 115JAA:
                            The Assessee was entitled to a brought forward MAT credit from AY 2008-09, which was not granted in the final assessment order. The Tribunal directed the AO to grant the MAT credit to the extent available.

                            6. Correct Credit for Advance Tax Paid:
                            The AO considered a lower amount of advance tax paid by the Assessee in the final assessment order compared to the draft assessment order. The Tribunal directed the AO to verify and provide the correct adjustment for the advance tax paid.

                            Conclusion:
                            The appeals by the Assessee and the Revenue were partly allowed. The Tribunal upheld the DRP's directions on the exclusion and inclusion of comparables, remanded the issue of operating margin computation back to the TPO, upheld the DRP's direction on Section 10A deductions, and directed the AO to grant the correct MAT credit and advance tax adjustments.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found