Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2014 (12) TMI 681 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Adjusts Comparable Companies List & Working Capital for Assessee Appeal The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeal, making significant adjustments to the list of comparable companies, directing recomputations for ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal Adjusts Comparable Companies List & Working Capital for Assessee Appeal

                          The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeal, making significant adjustments to the list of comparable companies, directing recomputations for working capital and risk adjustments, and clarifying the treatment of reimbursements and deductions under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal remanded certain issues back to the Transfer Pricing Officer for further examination, ultimately providing relief to the assessee on various grounds.




                          Issues Involved
                          1. Transfer Pricing Adjustment
                          2. Comparability of Companies
                          3. Working Capital Adjustment
                          4. Risk Adjustment
                          5. Reimbursement of Expenses
                          6. Deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act

                          Detailed Analysis

                          1. Transfer Pricing Adjustment
                          The primary issue was the adjustment of the Arm's Length Price (ALP) of international transactions. The assessee contested the adjustment of Rs. 5,96,07,719 made by the TPO, which was upheld by the DRP. The Tribunal examined the grounds related to the transfer pricing adjustment and noted that the assessee did not wish to press general grounds but focused on the comparability of individual companies selected by the TPO.

                          2. Comparability of Companies
                          The Tribunal analyzed the comparability of several companies included by the TPO and excluded by the assessee:

                          - Avani Cincom Technologies Ltd.: Excluded as it was into software products, not comparable to the assessee's software development services.
                          - Celestial Biolabs Ltd.: Excluded due to its involvement in bio-informatics software products/services, making it functionally different from the assessee.
                          - KALS Information Systems Ltd.: Excluded as it was engaged in software product development, not purely software services.
                          - Infosys Technologies Ltd.: Excluded due to its significant intangibles, brand value, and software product revenues, making it incomparable to the assessee.
                          - Wipro Ltd.: Excluded for having significant intangibles and being engaged in both software and product development services.
                          - Tata Elxsi Ltd.: Excluded as it was predominantly engaged in product designing services.
                          - Thirdware Solutions Ltd.: Excluded due to its involvement in product development and trading in software licenses.
                          - Lucid Software Ltd.: Excluded as it was engaged in software product development.
                          - Persistent Systems Ltd.: Excluded for being involved in product development and design services.
                          - Softsol India Ltd.: Excluded due to failing the Related Party Transaction (RPT) filter of 15%.

                          The Tribunal also remanded the issue of comparability of ICRA Techno Analytics Ltd., Aditya Birla Minacs IT Services Ltd., and Aditya Birla Minacs Technologies Ltd. back to the TPO for re-examination.

                          3. Working Capital Adjustment
                          The Tribunal directed the TPO to recompute the eligible working capital adjustment based on the revised set of comparables.

                          4. Risk Adjustment
                          The Tribunal remanded the issue of risk adjustment back to the TPO, directing them to consider the assessee's limited risk profile and make appropriate adjustments.

                          5. Reimbursement of Expenses
                          The Tribunal remanded the issue of reimbursement of expenses to the TPO for detailed examination. It was directed that if the receipts were mere recovery of expenses without any service element, they should not be considered as part of the cost base for computing the mark-up.

                          6. Deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act
                          The Tribunal addressed the issue of reducing telecommunication expenditure and expenditure incurred in foreign currency from export turnover while computing the deduction under Section 10A. Following the Karnataka High Court's decision in CIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd., the Tribunal directed that these expenses should also be excluded from total turnover. Consequently, the alternate grounds raised by the assessee were allowed, and there was no need to adjudicate the other grounds related to this issue.

                          Conclusion
                          The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeal, making significant adjustments to the list of comparable companies, directing recomputations for working capital and risk adjustments, and clarifying the treatment of reimbursements and deductions under Section 10A.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found