Transfer pricing case remanded for fresh adjudication with exclusion of seven comparables and verification of three others

The ITAT Indore remanded multiple transfer pricing issues to the AO/TPO for fresh adjudication. The tribunal directed exclusion of seven comparables (E-Infochips, E-zest Solutions, iGate Global Solutions, Lucid Software, Persistent Systems, Sankhya Infotech, and Wipro Technology Services) due to functional dissimilarity, lack of segmental data, or abnormal margins. Three comparables (Maveric Systems, Thinksoft Global Services, R Systems International) were directed for verification and potential inclusion. The depreciation adjustment claim raised as additional ground before DRP was remanded for proper verification. Foreign exchange gain treatment and working capital adjustments required fresh examination. The section 14A disallowance was also remanded for verification of expenditure related to exempt income. All grounds were partly allowed for statistical purposes.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Jurisdiction of the Assessment Order and Directions of the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP).
2. Transfer Pricing Adjustments.
3. Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act.
4. Interest under Sections 234B, 234D, and 244A of the Income Tax Act.

Summary:

Jurisdiction of the Assessment Order and Directions of the DRP:
The assessee challenged the jurisdiction of the assessment order passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 144C(13) and the directions issued by the DRP under Section 144C(8). The Tribunal dismissed these grounds as general in nature and not pressed by the assessee.

Transfer Pricing Adjustments:
The assessee disputed the upward adjustment of Rs. 220,97,90,410/- to the Arm's Length Price (ALP) determined by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) concerning international transactions for software development services.

1. Depreciation Adjustment: The Tribunal remanded the issue back to the Assessing Officer (AO)/TPO for verification, noting that the DRP did not provide speaking directions on the depreciation adjustment claimed due to higher depreciation rates used by the assessee compared to the comparable companies.

2. Exclusion of Comparables: The Tribunal directed the exclusion of certain companies (E-Infochips Limited, E-zest Solutions Limited, iGate Global Solutions Limited, Lucid Software Limited, Persistent Systems Limited, Sankhya Infotech Limited, and Wipro Technology Services Limited) from the list of comparables due to functional dissimilarities, lack of segmental data, and fluctuating margins.

3. Inclusion of Comparables: The Tribunal directed the inclusion of Maveric Systems Limited and Thinksoft Global Services Limited after verification, noting that the TPO had accepted these comparables in other assessment years and that the rejection reasons were not applicable.

4. Foreign Exchange Gain and Working Capital Adjustment: The Tribunal remanded the issue of considering foreign exchange gain as part of operating income and the working capital adjustment back to the AO/TPO for verification.

Disallowance under Section 14A:
The Tribunal remanded the issue of disallowance under Section 14A back to the AO for verification, noting that the assessee had made a suo moto disallowance of Rs. 20,37,506/- but the AO had not recorded satisfaction regarding the correctness of the assessee's claim. The Tribunal directed verification of the nexus between the expenditure and the earning of exempt income.

Interest under Sections 234B, 234D, and 244A:
These grounds were noted as consequential and not adjudicated at this juncture.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals for statistical purposes, remanding several issues back to the AO/TPO for verification and proper adjudication, ensuring the assessee is given an opportunity of hearing by following the principles of natural justice. The Stay Application was also disposed of accordingly.

---