Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2015 (3) TMI 1010 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        ITAT excludes non-comparable firms in transfer pricing; remands service charge review; upholds inclusive stock valuation under Section 145A ITAT Mumbai upheld exclusion of certain comparables (DIKL, SCL, MIL, PIL) from the transfer pricing analysis due to lack of functional comparability or ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          ITAT excludes non-comparable firms in transfer pricing; remands service charge review; upholds inclusive stock valuation under Section 145A

                          ITAT Mumbai upheld exclusion of certain comparables (DIKL, SCL, MIL, PIL) from the transfer pricing analysis due to lack of functional comparability or exceptional circumstances, directing ALP determination based on Atul Ltd. and IG Petrochemicals Ltd. only. The scope of adjustment was confined to international transactions between AEs. On management service charges paid to AEs, the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after granting the assessee a reasonable opportunity to prove services availed and ALP compliance. Regarding section 145A adjustments for closing stock valuation, the ITAT set aside the impugned order, directing the AO to apply the inclusive valuation method consistent with statutory mandate and judicial precedents, ruling in favor of the assessee for statistical purposes.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Inclusion and exclusion of comparables for benchmarking international transactions.
                          2. Disallowance of management service charges.
                          3. Addition under section 145A regarding the value of closing stock.
                          4. Addition under section 40(a)(ia).
                          5. Charging of interest under section 234B and 234C.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Inclusion and Exclusion of Comparables for Benchmarking International Transactions:
                          The primary issue revolved around the inclusion and exclusion of certain comparables for benchmarking the assessee's international transactions related to imports and exports. The assessee, engaged in the manufacture of specialty chemicals, selected four comparables: Dai- Ichi Karkaria Ltd., Sunshield Chemicals Limited, Indo-Nippon Chemicals Company Ltd., and Resinova Chemie Limited. The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) rejected these and selected Atul Ltd., IG Petrochemicals Ltd., Micro Inks Ltd., and Pidilite Industries Ltd. The Tribunal upheld the TPO's exclusion of Dai- Ichi Karkaria Ltd. and Sunshield Chemicals Limited due to functional dissimilarities. However, it directed the exclusion of Micro Inks Ltd. and Pidilite Industries Ltd. due to the lack of segmental data and the presence of mergers and acquisitions, respectively. The Tribunal emphasized that the transfer pricing adjustment should be restricted to transactions with Associated Enterprises (AEs) only.

                          2. Disallowance of Management Service Charges:
                          The assessee claimed a deduction for management service charges paid to its group companies amounting to Rs. 3,11,52,568/-. The TPO proposed an adjustment for the same amount, citing a lack of evidence regarding the services received. The Tribunal found that the issue was not properly examined at the lower level and restored the matter to the Assessing Officer (AO)/TPO for fresh adjudication, allowing the assessee a reasonable opportunity to substantiate its claim.

                          3. Addition Under Section 145A Regarding the Value of Closing Stock:
                          The AO observed that the assessee followed the 'exclusive method' of valuing inventory, which did not include excise duty, contrary to section 145A of the Income Tax Act. An addition of Rs. 1,25,91,360/- was made. The Tribunal directed the AO to re-evaluate the issue, ensuring that both opening and closing stocks are adjusted to include the duty element, following the precedents set by the Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court and the Hon'ble Delhi High Court.

                          4. Addition Under Section 40(a)(ia):
                          The assessee did not press this ground, and thus, it was dismissed by the Tribunal.

                          5. Charging of Interest Under Section 234B and 234C:
                          The Tribunal noted that the issue of charging interest under sections 234B and 234C is consequential and dependent on the final determination of the other issues.

                          Conclusion:
                          The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with directions for fresh adjudication on certain issues and upholding the exclusion of certain comparables. The Tribunal emphasized the need for proper functional comparability and adherence to statutory provisions in determining the arm's length price and other related adjustments.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found