Tribunal remits transfer pricing issue, grants Section 10AA deduction, excludes companies from comparables

The Tribunal remitted the transfer pricing adjustment issue back to the AO/TPO for fresh determination. Infosys Ltd. and TCS Ltd. were excluded from comparables, while Bodhtree Consulting Ltd. was upheld. Working capital adjustment was allowed based on annual figures. The deduction under Section 10AA was granted, overturning the AO's denial. The appeal was partly allowed, directing various adjustments and exclusions.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Transfer Pricing Adjustment
2. Inclusion of Comparable Companies
3. Working Capital Adjustment
4. Deduction under Section 10AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Transfer Pricing Adjustment:
The primary issue raised by the assessee concerns the addition of Rs. 3,84,30,722/- by the Assessing Officer (AO) due to transfer pricing adjustments. The assessee, an Indian branch office of Sony Mobile Communications International AB (SMCI), engaged in R&D services, adopted the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) with a Profit Level Indicator (PLI) of Operating profit/Operating cost to demonstrate that its international transactions were at arm’s length. The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) initially proposed an adjustment of Rs. 10,68,36,646/- but after the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) intervention, the final addition was reduced to Rs. 3.84 crore.

2. Inclusion of Comparable Companies:
The assessee contested the inclusion of three companies—Infosys Ltd., Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. (TCS), and Bodhtree Consulting Ltd.—in the final set of comparables used by the TPO.

i) Infosys Technologies Ltd.:
The TPO included Infosys Ltd. based on its software development services. However, the Tribunal found Infosys Ltd. to be incomparable due to its giantness in terms of risk profile, nature of services, number of employees, and ownership of branded products. The Tribunal, following the Delhi High Court judgment in CIT vs. Agnity India Technologies (P) Ltd., directed the exclusion of Infosys Ltd. from the list of comparables.

ii) TCS Ltd.:
TCS Ltd. was included by the TPO, but the Tribunal found it incomparable due to its revenue from the sale of equipment and software licenses and an extraordinary financial event involving the acquisition of Citigroup Inc.'s interest in TCS e-Serve Ltd. The Tribunal, referencing decisions in similar cases, directed the exclusion of TCS Ltd. from the list of comparables.

iii) Bodhtree Consulting Ltd.:
The TPO included Bodhtree Consulting Ltd., which was contested by the assessee on the grounds of functional dissimilarity and fluctuating profit margins. The Tribunal found Bodhtree Consulting Ltd. functionally similar to the assessee and rejected the argument of different revenue recognition models, thereby upholding its inclusion in the list of comparables.

3. Working Capital Adjustment:
The assessee requested a working capital adjustment, which was initially denied by the TPO on the grounds that it was irrelevant for a service industry. The Tribunal disagreed, stating that working capital adjustments are necessary to neutralize differences in trade receivables, trade payables, and inventory. The Tribunal directed the AO/TPO to compute and allow the working capital adjustment based on annual figures, not daily averages, following the precedent set in Navisite India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO.

4. Deduction under Section 10AA:
The assessee claimed a deduction of Rs. 5,42,10,177/- under Section 10AA, which the AO denied for three reasons: services were rendered to the head office, no foreign currency was brought into India, and the branch office cannot claim such deductions. The Tribunal found that the services were rendered to SEMC, not the head office, and the remuneration model satisfied the requirement of foreign currency receipt. The Tribunal directed the grant of deduction under Section 10AA, overturning the AO's decision.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal set aside the impugned order on the issue of transfer pricing adjustment and remitted the matter to the AO/TPO for fresh determination of the ALP of the international transaction of rendering software services. The Tribunal also directed the exclusion of Infosys Ltd. and TCS Ltd. from the list of comparables while upholding the inclusion of Bodhtree Consulting Ltd. Additionally, the Tribunal mandated the computation and allowance of working capital adjustment and granted the deduction under Section 10AA of the Act. The appeal was partly allowed.

---