Appeal partly allowed for recalculating transfer pricing adjustments and re-examining foreign tax credit claim

The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed recalculating transfer pricing adjustments, selecting comparables, and allocating indirect costs. The AO was instructed to re-examine the foreign tax credit claim.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Transfer Pricing Adjustment for Software Development Services.
2. Transfer Pricing Adjustment for IT Enabled Services (ITES).
3. Allocation of Indirect Costs among Eligible and Non-Eligible Units under Section 10A.
4. Allowing Foreign Tax Credit.

Detailed Analysis:

I. Transfer Pricing Adjustment for Software Development Services

a) TP adjustment in respect of transactions with non-AEsRs.

The first issue concerns the computation of transfer pricing adjustment in respect of transactions with Associated Enterprises (AEs) and non-AEs. The TPO included total operational costs of the Software development segment, which led to an adjustment of Rs. 31,62,04,137/-. The assessee contended that no adjustment should be made for transactions with non-AEs. The Tribunal held that transfer pricing adjustments should only be made for transactions with AEs and not non-AEs. The matter was remanded to the TPO/AO for recalculating the adjustment considering only international transactions with AEs.

b) Computation of the assessee’s profit margin

The second aspect is the computation of the assessee’s operating margin, initially calculated at 14.77%. The Tribunal directed that the revenue from non-AE transactions should be excluded in determining the ALP of the international transaction. The Tribunal also provided detailed instructions on apportioning personnel expenses, operational expenses, and depreciation between AE and non-AE transactions.

c) Selection of Comparables

The Tribunal examined the comparability of several companies included by the TPO and those excluded. It ordered the exclusion of e-Infochips Bangalore Limited, Infosys Technologies Ltd., and Tata Elxi Limited due to functional dissimilarities or inclusion of non-comparable segments. The inclusion of Infinite Data System Pvt. Ltd. was upheld, while the comparability of Sonata Software Limited was remanded for recalculating RPTs. The Tribunal also directed the inclusion of certain companies if the relevant financial data could be adjusted for the financial year ending 31st March.

II. Transfer Pricing Adjustment for IT Enabled Services (ITES)

a) Computation of the assessee’s profit margin

The Tribunal directed that the same principles applied to the computation of profit margins for Software Development Services should be applied to ITES. It provided specific instructions on retaining operating income, apportioning employee expenses, depreciation, and other operational expenses.

b) Comparables

The Tribunal reviewed the comparability of several companies included by the TPO and excluded by the assessee. It ordered the exclusion of Accentia Technologies Ltd. and Infosys BPO due to extraordinary financial events. TCS E-Serve International Ltd. was excluded due to its mixed revenue from transaction processing and technical services. However, TCS E-Serve Ltd. was retained as comparable despite objections regarding high profit/turnover. The Tribunal directed the inclusion of CG-Vak Software & Exports Ltd. (BPO segment) and Datamatics Financial Services Ltd. and remanded the comparability of R Systems International Ltd. and Caliber Points Business Solutions Ltd. for further examination.

III. Allocation of Indirect Costs among Eligible and Non-Eligible Units under Section 10A

The AO reallocated indirect costs among eligible and non-eligible units based on gross revenue receipts, reducing the claim of deduction under Section 10A. The Tribunal found that the assessee maintained consolidated accounts and directed the AO to apportion indirect costs on a reasonable basis, considering specific keys for different expenses where available.

IV. Allowing Foreign Tax Credit

The Tribunal directed the AO to examine the assessee’s claim for foreign tax credit amounting to Rs. 2,35,708/- and allow relief as per law.

Conclusion

The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the Tribunal providing detailed instructions for recalculating transfer pricing adjustments, selecting comparables, and allocating indirect costs. The AO was directed to re-examine the foreign tax credit claim.

---