Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Assessee's Appeal Partly Allowed: Redetermination of Arm's Length Price and Ad-Hoc Disallowance for Fresh Consideration</h1> <h3>Dialogic Networks (India) Private Limited Versus The DCIT, Cir. 3 (3), Mumbai.</h3> The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed. The Assessing Officer/Transfer Pricing Officer is directed to redetermine the arm's length price of the ... Transfer Pricing Adjustment made on Software Development Services Segment - comparable selection criteria - Held that:- The assessee company has set-up unit for development of telecommunication software for its group entities and it also provides marketing and customer services and back-office support services (ITES) to its group entities. One of the segment is Provision of software development services to its Associated Enterprise based in Israel and USA, thus companies functionally dissimilar with that of assessee need to be deselected from final list. Expenditure in PSE (Nondomestic Division) - Held that:- One thing that is clearly discernible is that the disallowance has been made on an adhoc basis without pointing out any particular item of expenditure which is relatable to the non- PSE division. It is also emerging from the record that the action of the Assessing Officer is based on similar addition made in assessment year 2008- 09. Before us, nothing has been brought out to show the finality of the addition made in preceding assessment year 2008-09. However, additions made on mere conjectures and surmises are unsustainable. Be that as it may, considering the entirety of circumstances, we deem it fit and proper to restore the matter back to the file of Assessing Officer, who shall reconsider the aforesaid addition afresh as per law, after allowing the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard in support of its stand. Thus, on this aspect assessee succeeds for statistical purposes. Issues Involved:1. Transfer Pricing - Adjustment on Software Development Services Segment2. Transfer Pricing - Adjustment on Global Call Center Services Segment3. Transfer Pricing - General4. Corporate Tax - Ad-hoc Disallowance of ExpenditureDetailed Analysis:1. Transfer Pricing - Adjustment on Software Development Services Segment:The primary issue pertains to an adjustment of Rs. 1,03,43,472/- made to the international transaction of software development services provided by the assessee to its Associated Enterprises (AEs). The assessee, a 100% subsidiary of Veraz Networks Ltd., USA, used the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) with Operating Profit to Total Cost (OP/TC) as the profit level indicator (PLI). The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) did not dispute the method or PLI but disagreed on the selection of comparables, resulting in an average margin of 23.23%.Exclusion of Certain Comparables:- Persistent Systems & Solutions Ltd.: Excluded due to differences in functions, assets, and risks, including involvement in software product development and research activities.- Sonata Software Ltd.: Excluded due to related party transactions (RPTs) exceeding 25% of total revenue.- Igate Global Solutions Ltd.: Excluded as it operates in IT enabled services (ITES), not purely in software development.- Bodhtree Consulting Ltd.: Excluded due to abnormal high margins not reflecting normal business conditions.- Genesys International Corporation Ltd.: Excluded as it provides geospatial services and ITES, not comparable to software development services.- FCS Software Solutions Ltd.: Excluded due to diverse activities and lack of segmental financial information.Inclusion of Certain Comparables:- Sagarsoft (India) Ltd.: Matter restored to the Assessing Officer/TPO for verification of export turnover filter compliance.- CG-Vak Software & Exports Ltd.: Included following the precedent set by the Bangalore Bench of the Tribunal.- Computech International Ltd.: Matter restored to the Assessing Officer/TPO for verification of employee cost filter compliance.- Goldstone Technologies Ltd.: Matter restored to the Assessing Officer/TPO for reconsideration as it engages in software development services.2. Transfer Pricing - Adjustment on Global Call Center Services Segment:The issue involves an adjustment of Rs. 22,37,025/- to the international transaction of Global Call Center Services. The TPO selected comparables resulting in an average margin of 23.63%.Exclusion of Certain Comparables:- Informed Technologies Ltd.: Excluded as it operates as an IT-enabled, knowledge-based back-office processing center, not comparable to call center services.- Rev IT Systems Ltd.: Excluded due to RPTs exceeding 25% of total revenues.Inclusion of Certain Comparables:- Allsec Technologies Ltd.: Included as it was previously considered a good comparable and not a persistently loss-making concern.3. Transfer Pricing - General:The assessee raised issues regarding the use of multiple-year financial data, non-allowance of working capital adjustment for comparable companies, and the application of a plus-minus 5% variation while computing the arm's length price under section 92C. These issues were not specifically detailed in the judgment.4. Corporate Tax - Ad-hoc Disallowance of Expenditure:The issue pertains to an addition of Rs. 38,97,332/- made by the Assessing Officer out of expenditure in the PSE (Non-domestic Division). The disallowance was made on an ad-hoc basis without specific identification of expenses related to non-PSE divisions. The matter has been restored to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration, with directions to provide the assessee a reasonable opportunity to support its stand.Conclusion:The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed. The Assessing Officer/Transfer Pricing Officer is directed to redetermine the arm's length price of the transactions as per the directions given, and the matter of ad-hoc disallowance of expenditure is restored for fresh consideration.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found