Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2021 (1) TMI 775 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Ruling: Comparable Companies Excluded, Working Capital Adjusted, Communication Charges Excluded from Export Turnover The Tribunal allowed the exclusion of specific comparable companies for determining the arm's length price, directed working capital adjustment, and ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal Ruling: Comparable Companies Excluded, Working Capital Adjusted, Communication Charges Excluded from Export Turnover

                          The Tribunal allowed the exclusion of specific comparable companies for determining the arm's length price, directed working capital adjustment, and upheld the exclusion of communication charges from export turnover. The assessee's appeal was partly allowed, and the revenue's appeal was dismissed.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Exclusion of certain comparable companies for determining the arm's length price (ALP).
                          2. Working capital adjustment.
                          3. Exclusion of communication charges from export turnover and total turnover.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Exclusion of Certain Comparable Companies for Determining the ALP:

                          The assessee, engaged in software development services, contested the inclusion of specific comparable companies by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO). The TPO had identified 26 comparable companies, but the assessee sought the exclusion of 13 of these companies. The Tribunal referenced a similar case, Sonus Networks India Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT, where 10 out of the 13 companies were excluded based on the following findings:

                          - Avani Cimcon Technologies Ltd.: Excluded due to revenue from software products without segmental details.
                          - Celestial Labs Ltd.: Excluded as it is primarily a research & development company.
                          - E-Zest Solutions Ltd.: Excluded due to its engagement in product development and high-end technical services, categorized as KPO services.
                          - Helios & Matheson Information Technology Ltd.: Excluded due to engagement in the sale of software products.
                          - Infosys Technologies Ltd.: Excluded due to significant intangibles and revenue from software products without segmental details.
                          - KALS Information Systems Ltd.: Excluded due to revenue from both software development and products, and involvement in training.
                          - Persistent Systems Ltd.: Excluded due to engagement in product development and design services without segmental details.
                          - Wipro Ltd.: Excluded due to engagement in both software and product development services without segmental bifurcation.
                          - Flextronics Software Systems Ltd. (Seg): Excluded due to contradictory information obtained under section 133(6) and annual report.
                          - Ishir Infotech Ltd.: Excluded as it did not meet the 25% employee cost filter.

                          The Tribunal directed the exclusion of these companies and remanded the comparability of R Systems International Ltd. to the TPO for further examination.

                          2. Working Capital Adjustment:

                          The Tribunal addressed the issue of whether working capital adjustment should be allowed. The CIT(A) had denied the adjustment, but the Tribunal referenced the case of Huawei Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. v. JCIT, where it was held that working capital adjustment must be given. The Tribunal emphasized that the net profit margin from comparable uncontrolled transactions should be adjusted for differences that could materially affect the profit margin. The Tribunal found no error in the TPO's working capital adjustment and directed that the adjustment as worked out by the TPO should be allowed.

                          3. Exclusion of Communication Charges from Export Turnover and Total Turnover:

                          The Tribunal considered the revenue's appeal regarding the exclusion of communication charges from export turnover and total turnover. The Tribunal followed the decision of the Karnataka High Court in CIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd., which held that communication charges should be excluded from both export turnover and total turnover. This decision was upheld by the Supreme Court in CIT v. HCL Technologies Ltd. Consequently, the Tribunal rejected the revenue's grounds on this issue.

                          Conclusion:

                          In summary, the Tribunal allowed the exclusion of certain comparable companies as requested by the assessee, directed the TPO to compute the ALP accordingly, allowed the working capital adjustment, and upheld the exclusion of communication charges from both export turnover and total turnover. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed, while the appeal by the assessee was partly allowed.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found