Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the power conferred on the executive to extend laws to Delhi, Ajmer-Merwara and Part C States with restrictions and modifications was a valid form of legislative delegation, and whether the impugned enactments were ultra vires the legislatures that passed them.
Analysis: The opinions examined the historical position of Indian legislatures, the nature of legislative power under the pre-Constitution and post-Constitution regimes, and the distinction between permissible conditional or subordinate legislation and an impermissible transfer of essential legislative function. The reasoning also considered the effect of powers to apply, restrict, modify, repeal or amend laws, and the relevance of prior authorities on delegation in Indian, Canadian, Australian and American constitutional law.
Conclusion: The judges were divided on whether the impugned provisions were wholly or partly valid, and no single majority view emerged on the scope of permissible delegation in all the questions referred.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered with differing opinions, leaving the constitutional position on the impugned provisions not concluded by one unified holding.
Ratio Decidendi: A legislature may entrust subordinate or conditional powers to implement an enacted policy, but the validity of any wider conferment depends on whether the constitutional instrument permits the legislature to retain its essential law-making function.