Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New Feature Launched βœ•

Introducing the β€œIn Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.

  • βš–οΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
  • πŸ” Narrow down results with higher precision

Try it now in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (9) TMI 139

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ki Arora, Adv. For Respondent : Sh Amresh Jain (DR) ORDER After rejecting the request for adjournment and after hearing the learned DR and going through the impugned order of the Commissioner, we find that the Appellants have been taxed to the extent of Rs. 56,50,501/- under the category of 'Erection, Commissioning or Installation Services' and also 'Management, Maintenance and Repair Services'....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....een held that prior to the introduction of 'Works Contract' w.e.f. 01.06.2007, the services cannot be taxed under the individual category, which were in existence prior to the said date.  Inasmuch as the law stands declared and inasmuch as the said decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court was not before the Commissioner while passing the impugned order, we consider it fit to set aside the same a....