<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 139 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331878</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order taxing the Appellants under &#039;Erection, Commissioning or Installation Services&#039; and &#039;Management, Maintenance and Repair Services&#039; instead of &#039;Works Contract Services&#039; post 01.06.2007. Referring to Larson &amp;amp; Toubro Ltd. Vs CCE, the Tribunal held that services cannot be taxed under previous categories after the introduction of &#039;Works Contract Services.&#039; The matter was remanded for fresh decision in light of the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment, allowing the Commissioner to reassess without delving into the case&#039;s merits or limitations. The Appellants were granted an opportunity for a fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2016 17:45:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440014" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 139 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331878</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order taxing the Appellants under &#039;Erection, Commissioning or Installation Services&#039; and &#039;Management, Maintenance and Repair Services&#039; instead of &#039;Works Contract Services&#039; post 01.06.2007. Referring to Larson &amp;amp; Toubro Ltd. Vs CCE, the Tribunal held that services cannot be taxed under previous categories after the introduction of &#039;Works Contract Services.&#039; The matter was remanded for fresh decision in light of the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment, allowing the Commissioner to reassess without delving into the case&#039;s merits or limitations. The Appellants were granted an opportunity for a fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>