Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New Feature Launched βœ•

Introducing the β€œIn Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.

  • βš–οΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
  • πŸ” Narrow down results with higher precision

Try it now in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (9) TMI 140

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Respondent ORDER After hearing the Ld. DR for the Revenue as nobody appeared for the appellant, we find that the appellant who are 100% exporter filed the refund claim of service tax paid on the services so utilized for export of the goods in terms of the notification number 41/2007-ST. The lower authorities have rejected the refund claim on the ground that they are not specified services in t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ide Final Order No. ST/A/52038/2016 dated 01.06.2016 iv. CCE & ST Visakhapatnam Vs. RAK Ceramics India Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE Madurai Vs. Tata Coffee Ltd. vi. Commissioner Vs. Adani Enterprises Ltd. vii. Shree Ram Gum and Chemicals Vs. CCE Jaipur 2016-TIOL-1717-CESTAT-DEL viii. Suncity Art Exporters & ors. vs. CCE Jaipur 2014-TIOL-2319-CESTAT-DEL 3. Ld. DR agrees that the disputed services ....