2016 (9) TMI 138
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... These appeals are directed against Order-in-Appeal No: YDB/4 & 5/LTU/MUM/2012 dated 27/01/2012 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax (Appeals), LTU, Mumbai. Since both the appeals raise a common question and the issue involved is also same, they are being disposed of by a common order. 2. Heard both the sides and perused the records. 3. The issue involved....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....2015, I find that identical issue was decided by the Division Bench relying upon the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay in the case of Coca Cola India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise 2009 (242) ELT 168. The bench upheld eligibility to avail CENVAT credit of the various services rendered at the residential quarters. The bench also distinguished the submissions mad....


TaxTMI
TaxTMI