Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New Feature Launched βœ•

Introducing the β€œIn Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.

  • βš–οΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
  • πŸ” Narrow down results with higher precision

Try it now in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (9) TMI 138

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... These appeals are directed against Order-in-Appeal No: YDB/4 & 5/LTU/MUM/2012  dated 27/01/2012 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax (Appeals), LTU, Mumbai.  Since both the appeals raise a common question and the issue involved is also same, they are being disposed of by a common order. 2. Heard both the sides and perused the records.  3. The issue involved....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....2015, I find that identical issue was decided by the Division Bench relying upon the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay in the case of Coca Cola India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise 2009 (242) ELT 168.  The bench upheld eligibility to avail CENVAT credit of the various services rendered at the residential quarters.  The bench also distinguished the submissions mad....