Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Anti-dumping duty withdrawal: mid term review finds no material injury, prompting rescission of prior duty notification. A mid term review found acrylic fibre from Italy still exported below normal value but concluded there was no material injury and no likelihood of recurrence; the designated authority recommended withdrawal and the Central Government, under section 9A and rule 23 of the anti dumping rules, rescinds the earlier notification imposing anti dumping duty, saving prior actions.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Anti-dumping duty withdrawal: mid term review finds no material injury, prompting rescission of prior duty notification.
A mid term review found acrylic fibre from Italy still exported below normal value but concluded there was no material injury and no likelihood of recurrence; the designated authority recommended withdrawal and the Central Government, under section 9A and rule 23 of the anti dumping rules, rescinds the earlier notification imposing anti dumping duty, saving prior actions.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.