1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Bidder challenges power utility FRP-fencing tender as unduly restrictive, seeks relaxed prequalification to restore competitive procurement</h1> A state electricity utility's tender for FRP fencing is challenged by industry as unduly restrictive, with pre-qualification criteria allegedly permitting only a handful of vendors to bid, raising competition, value-for-money and monopolisation concerns under public procurement principles. A Gujarat-based bidder formally requested amendments-expanding JV partner limits, lowering experience thresholds and easing work-order percentage requirements-to broaden eligibility. Legal risks include procurement challenges, potential injunctions, bid protests or directions to re-tender, and scrutiny for non-compliance with competitive procurement norms; the utility's response will determine whether the procurement proceeds or faces litigation and administrative remedies.