Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
In a writ challenging actions under PMLA, the petitioner sought to amend the main prayer to add a declaration that Sections 50 and 63 are unconstitutional. The court held that the vires of these provisions already stands upheld by the SC, and the petitioner's plea that the SC ruling is per incuriam could not be entertained in this proceeding; further, since writ proceedings are not governed by CPC procedure, the court declined to permit an amendment introducing a relief it could not consider. Accordingly, the proposed additional relief was rejected, while all other amendments were allowed - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.