<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Challenge to PMLA summons and penalties, with bid to add unconstitutionality claim for Sections 50 and 63 rejected</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95322</link>
    <description>In a writ challenging actions under PMLA, the petitioner sought to amend the main prayer to add a declaration that Sections 50 and 63 are unconstitutional. The court held that the vires of these provisions already stands upheld by the SC, and the petitioner&#039;s plea that the SC ruling is per incuriam could not be entertained in this proceeding; further, since writ proceedings are not governed by CPC procedure, the court declined to permit an amendment introducing a relief it could not consider. Accordingly, the proposed additional relief was rejected, while all other amendments were allowed - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 07:59:05 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 07:59:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=873482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Challenge to PMLA summons and penalties, with bid to add unconstitutionality claim for Sections 50 and 63 rejected</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95322</link>
      <description>In a writ challenging actions under PMLA, the petitioner sought to amend the main prayer to add a declaration that Sections 50 and 63 are unconstitutional. The court held that the vires of these provisions already stands upheld by the SC, and the petitioner&#039;s plea that the SC ruling is per incuriam could not be entertained in this proceeding; further, since writ proceedings are not governed by CPC procedure, the court declined to permit an amendment introducing a relief it could not consider. Accordingly, the proposed additional relief was rejected, while all other amendments were allowed - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 07:59:05 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>