PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the assessees' appeals and deleted all additions made under s.153C. Relying on a coordinate bench decision arising from the same search group, ITAT held there was no seized material or statements indicating receipt of cash or other unaccounted consideration, nor any identified payer or corresponding additions in counterparties' hands. It held that in circular transactions, the margin disclosed in the books represents the commission element and, absent incriminating material, no higher income can be estimated on mere presumption. ITAT ruled that s.153C cannot be used for roving reassessment without assessee-specific incriminating material, and that estimated additions based on alleged bogus purchases/sales and enhanced profit rates were unsustainable. The jurisdictional challenge under s.153C was rendered academic.
ITAT allowed the assessees' appeals and deleted all additions made under s.153C. Relying on a coordinate bench decision arising from the same search group, ITAT held there was no seized material or statements indicating receipt of cash or other unaccounted consideration, nor any identified payer or corresponding additions in counterparties' hands. It held that in circular transactions, the margin disclosed in the books represents the commission element and, absent incriminating material, no higher income can be estimated on mere presumption. ITAT ruled that s.153C cannot be used for roving reassessment without assessee-specific incriminating material, and that estimated additions based on alleged bogus purchases/sales and enhanced profit rates were unsustainable. The jurisdictional challenge under s.153C was rendered academic.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.