PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held that post-2016 amendment to Section 13(8) SARFAESI, only the borrower's right of redemption is extinguished upon publication of the sale notice; ownership in the secured asset transfers only upon issuance of a sale certificate under Rule 9(6). Relying on Indian Overseas Bank and Delhi HC precedent, the Court held that once an interim moratorium under Section 96 IBC commences, the secured creditor cannot accept balance consideration or complete the statutory sale. As substantial payments and receipt thereof occurred after the interim moratorium, no sale certificate could lawfully issue and no ownership passed to the auction purchaser. The petitioner, therefore, had no right to possession. Writ petition dismissed.
HC held that post-2016 amendment to Section 13(8) SARFAESI, only the borrower's right of redemption is extinguished upon publication of the sale notice; ownership in the secured asset transfers only upon issuance of a sale certificate under Rule 9(6). Relying on Indian Overseas Bank and Delhi HC precedent, the Court held that once an interim moratorium under Section 96 IBC commences, the secured creditor cannot accept balance consideration or complete the statutory sale. As substantial payments and receipt thereof occurred after the interim moratorium, no sale certificate could lawfully issue and no ownership passed to the auction purchaser. The petitioner, therefore, had no right to possession. Writ petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.