Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT allowed the assessee-firm's appeal and deleted the addition made u/s 69A r/w s.115BBE on account of partners' capital introduction. It held that payments for land purchase were substantially made directly by partners from their bank accounts and duly reflected in registered sale deeds and corresponding journal entries, rendering the AO's factual assumption erroneous. ITAT further held that any unexplained capital introduced by partners is assessable, if at all, in the hands of the respective partners and not the firm. The statutory requirement to prove "source of source" inserted in s.68 w.e.f. 01.04.2023 was held inapplicable to AY 2017-18.
ITAT allowed the assessee-firm's appeal and deleted the addition made u/s 69A r/w s.115BBE on account of partners' capital introduction. It held that payments for land purchase were substantially made directly by partners from their bank accounts and duly reflected in registered sale deeds and corresponding journal entries, rendering the AO's factual assumption erroneous. ITAT further held that any unexplained capital introduced by partners is assessable, if at all, in the hands of the respective partners and not the firm. The statutory requirement to prove "source of source" inserted in s.68 w.e.f. 01.04.2023 was held inapplicable to AY 2017-18.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
