<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Addition u/s 69A r/w 115BBE on partners&#039; capital deleted; s.68 source-of-source rule not retrospective for AY 2017-18</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94939</link>
    <description>ITAT allowed the assessee-firm&#039;s appeal and deleted the addition made u/s 69A r/w s.115BBE on account of partners&#039; capital introduction. It held that payments for land purchase were substantially made directly by partners from their bank accounts and duly reflected in registered sale deeds and corresponding journal entries, rendering the AO&#039;s factual assumption erroneous. ITAT further held that any unexplained capital introduced by partners is assessable, if at all, in the hands of the respective partners and not the firm. The statutory requirement to prove &quot;source of source&quot; inserted in s.68 w.e.f. 01.04.2023 was held inapplicable to AY 2017-18.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 10:50:27 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 10:50:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=870777" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Addition u/s 69A r/w 115BBE on partners&#039; capital deleted; s.68 source-of-source rule not retrospective for AY 2017-18</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94939</link>
      <description>ITAT allowed the assessee-firm&#039;s appeal and deleted the addition made u/s 69A r/w s.115BBE on account of partners&#039; capital introduction. It held that payments for land purchase were substantially made directly by partners from their bank accounts and duly reflected in registered sale deeds and corresponding journal entries, rendering the AO&#039;s factual assumption erroneous. ITAT further held that any unexplained capital introduced by partners is assessable, if at all, in the hands of the respective partners and not the firm. The statutory requirement to prove &quot;source of source&quot; inserted in s.68 w.e.f. 01.04.2023 was held inapplicable to AY 2017-18.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 10:50:27 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>