PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Office memorandum clarifies the procedure when a taxpayer's MAP application under Rule 44G is successfully resolved while an income tax appeal is pending before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). Following mutual agreement, the taxpayer must accept or reject the resolution and provide proof of appeal withdrawal. Since no explicit process existed for withdrawal at the CIT(A) stage, the memorandum directs CIT(A) offices to issue an intimation confirming acceptance of withdrawal of the appeal or specific grounds covered by the MAP resolution. This intimation will constitute valid proof of withdrawal for purposes of Rule 44G(8).
Office memorandum clarifies the procedure when a taxpayer's MAP application under Rule 44G is successfully resolved while an income tax appeal is pending before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). Following mutual agreement, the taxpayer must accept or reject the resolution and provide proof of appeal withdrawal. Since no explicit process existed for withdrawal at the CIT(A) stage, the memorandum directs CIT(A) offices to issue an intimation confirming acceptance of withdrawal of the appeal or specific grounds covered by the MAP resolution. This intimation will constitute valid proof of withdrawal for purposes of Rule 44G(8).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.