PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT allowed the appeal filed by M/s X against denial of exemption under Customs N/N. 57/2017 dated 30.06.2017. It held that the imported Mechanical Electrical Assembly Front qualifies as "Display Assembly" for use in manufacture of cellular mobile phones under serial no. 6(a)(iv) of the notification. Inclusion of a nondetachable battery and other additional components (receiver, PCBA, vibration motor) in the assembly does not alter its essential character as a display assembly nor deprive it of exemption. The Tribunal found no evidentiary basis for the department's reliance on "common trade parlance" and reiterated that exemption must be determined strictly on the plain language of the notification, without importing external policy documents or presumed intent. The impugned order of the lower authority was set aside and the customs duty demand and consequential liabilities were quashed.
CESTAT allowed the appeal filed by M/s X against denial of exemption under Customs N/N. 57/2017 dated 30.06.2017. It held that the imported Mechanical Electrical Assembly Front qualifies as "Display Assembly" for use in manufacture of cellular mobile phones under serial no. 6(a)(iv) of the notification. Inclusion of a nondetachable battery and other additional components (receiver, PCBA, vibration motor) in the assembly does not alter its essential character as a display assembly nor deprive it of exemption. The Tribunal found no evidentiary basis for the department's reliance on "common trade parlance" and reiterated that exemption must be determined strictly on the plain language of the notification, without importing external policy documents or presumed intent. The impugned order of the lower authority was set aside and the customs duty demand and consequential liabilities were quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
