PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held that sales tax dues of the wound-up private company cannot presently be recovered from the petitioner-director under s.18 CST Act, as mandatory preconditions were not satisfied. While the company's winding up fulfilled the first statutory requirement, the respondent failed to establish or record any finding that non-recovery of dues was attributable to gross negligence, misfeasance, or breach of duty by the petitioner in relation to the company's affairs. The petitioner's contention that he was a young student at the relevant time and not responsible for such defaults remained unrefuted. Given the lapse of over 20 years and non-compliance with s.18 procedures, the writ petition was allowed, with liberty to the respondent to lodge its claim before the Official Liquidator and proceed afresh under s.18 CST Act in accordance with law.
HC held that sales tax dues of the wound-up private company cannot presently be recovered from the petitioner-director under s.18 CST Act, as mandatory preconditions were not satisfied. While the company's winding up fulfilled the first statutory requirement, the respondent failed to establish or record any finding that non-recovery of dues was attributable to gross negligence, misfeasance, or breach of duty by the petitioner in relation to the company's affairs. The petitioner's contention that he was a young student at the relevant time and not responsible for such defaults remained unrefuted. Given the lapse of over 20 years and non-compliance with s.18 procedures, the writ petition was allowed, with liberty to the respondent to lodge its claim before the Official Liquidator and proceed afresh under s.18 CST Act in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.