Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

Director shielded from sales tax recovery under s.18 CST Act due to unmet preconditions and long delay

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....HC held that sales tax dues of the wound-up private company cannot presently be recovered from the petitioner-director under s.18 CST Act, as mandatory preconditions were not satisfied. While the company's winding up fulfilled the first statutory requirement, the respondent failed to establish or record any finding that non-recovery of dues was attributable to gross negligence, misfeasance, or breach of duty by the petitioner in relation to the company's affairs. The petitioner's contention that he was a young student at the relevant time and not responsible for such defaults remained unrefuted. Given the lapse of over 20 years and non-compliance with s.18 procedures, the writ petition was allowed, with liberty to the respondent to lodge its claim before the Official Liquidator and proceed afresh under s.18 CST Act in accordance with law.....