Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
HC held that the appeal is disposed and the Respondent (CHA) licence is restored subject to financial conditions. The Court affirmed that a three-year suspension sufficiently marks the misconduct and refused to disturb CESTAT's finding on liability for confiscation and prior suspension. The HC modified CESTAT's order: of the Rs. 5,00,000 security deposit, Rs. 2,00,000 is forfeited; the CHA's licence will be renewed upon deposit of an additional Rs. 2,00,000 to Customs; and a further sum of Rs. 2,00,000 must be deposited as a redemption/penalty payment. The balance of the appeal is dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.