https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94294 HC held that the appeal is disposed and the Respondent (CHA) licence is restored subject to financial conditions. The Court affirmed that a three-year suspension sufficiently marks the misconduct and refused to disturb CESTAT's finding on liability for confiscation and prior suspension. The HC modified CESTAT's order: of the Rs. 5,00,000 security deposit, Rs. 2,00,000 is forfeited; the CHA's licence will be renewed upon deposit of an additional Rs. 2,00,000 to Customs; and a further sum of Rs. 2,00,000 must be deposited as a redemption/penalty payment. The balance of the appeal is dismissed. en-us Wed, 19 Nov 2025 08:52:41 +0530 Wed, 19 Nov 2025 08:52:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94294 HC held that the appeal is disposed and the Respondent (CHA) licence is restored subject to financial conditions. The Court affirmed that a three-year suspension sufficiently marks the misconduct and refused to disturb CESTAT's finding on liability for confiscation and prior suspension. The HC modified CESTAT's order: of the Rs. 5,00,000 security deposit, Rs. 2,00,000 is forfeited; the CHA's licence will be renewed upon deposit of an additional Rs. 2,00,000 to Customs; and a further sum of Rs. 2,00,000 must be deposited as a redemption/penalty payment. The balance of the appeal is dismissed. Highlights Customs Wed, 19 Nov 2025 08:52:41 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94294