Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The AT affirmed the adjudicating authority's findings that the appellant and co-actors contravened sections 3(b) and 3(c) of FEMA, 1999 by effecting and facilitating unauthorized outward remittances and inward receipts through informal channels (hawala) without RBI/authorized banking route. The Tribunal held the investigation and contemporaneous material, including admissions, mobile/SMS records and corroborative statements, establish deliberate under-invoicing, cash payments in India and onward foreign transfers aggregating the amounts alleged, rejecting the retraction as unavailing. The AT declined to interfere with the impugned order, thereby upholding the authority's determination of illegal foreign exchange transactions and liability under the FEMA provisions.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
