<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Liability under Sections 3(b) and 3(c) of FEMA for unauthorized hawala remittances, under-invoicing and illegal foreign transfers upheld</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94083</link>
    <description>The AT affirmed the adjudicating authority&#039;s findings that the appellant and co-actors contravened sections 3(b) and 3(c) of FEMA, 1999 by effecting and facilitating unauthorized outward remittances and inward receipts through informal channels (hawala) without RBI/authorized banking route. The Tribunal held the investigation and contemporaneous material, including admissions, mobile/SMS records and corroborative statements, establish deliberate under-invoicing, cash payments in India and onward foreign transfers aggregating the amounts alleged, rejecting the retraction as unavailing. The AT declined to interfere with the impugned order, thereby upholding the authority&#039;s determination of illegal foreign exchange transactions and liability under the FEMA provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 08:17:49 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 08:17:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=863954" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Liability under Sections 3(b) and 3(c) of FEMA for unauthorized hawala remittances, under-invoicing and illegal foreign transfers upheld</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94083</link>
      <description>The AT affirmed the adjudicating authority&#039;s findings that the appellant and co-actors contravened sections 3(b) and 3(c) of FEMA, 1999 by effecting and facilitating unauthorized outward remittances and inward receipts through informal channels (hawala) without RBI/authorized banking route. The Tribunal held the investigation and contemporaneous material, including admissions, mobile/SMS records and corroborative statements, establish deliberate under-invoicing, cash payments in India and onward foreign transfers aggregating the amounts alleged, rejecting the retraction as unavailing. The AT declined to interfere with the impugned order, thereby upholding the authority&#039;s determination of illegal foreign exchange transactions and liability under the FEMA provisions.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 08:17:49 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>