PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT held that the appellant's ring-back tone service...
Appellant's ring-back tone service held OIDAR, taxable domestically for 01.07.2012-31.07.2016; liability confirmed, penalties vacated, remanded for re-determination.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
CESTAT held that the appellant's ring-back tone service constitutes Online Information Database Access and Retrieval (OIDAR) services, not Information Technology Software Services (ITSS), because third-party content is stored, managed and delivered from the appellant's servers to callers via integration with telecom MSCs. Services routed from the appellant's GNOC in India are taxable in India and do not qualify as exports for 01.07.2012-31.07.2016; supplies to Jammu & Kashmir and foreign branches (where data retrieval emanates from India) are therefore within taxable territory. The extended limitation was not invoked; no suppression to evade duty was found. Tax liability is confirmed for the normal period, penalties are not sustained, and the matter is remanded for re-determination consistent with this reasoning.
CESTAT held that the appellant's ring-back tone service constitutes Online Information Database Access and Retrieval (OIDAR) services, not Information Technology Software Services (ITSS), because third-party content is stored, managed and delivered from the appellant's servers to callers via integration with telecom MSCs. Services routed from the appellant's GNOC in India are taxable in India and do not qualify as exports for 01.07.2012-31.07.2016; supplies to Jammu & Kashmir and foreign branches (where data retrieval emanates from India) are therefore within taxable territory. The extended limitation was not invoked; no suppression to evade duty was found. Tax liability is confirmed for the normal period, penalties are not sustained, and the matter is remanded for re-determination consistent with this reasoning.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.