<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellant&#039;s ring-back tone service held OIDAR, taxable domestically for 01.07.2012-31.07.2016; liability confirmed, penalties vacated, remanded for re-determination.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94082</link>
    <description>CESTAT held that the appellant&#039;s ring-back tone service constitutes Online Information Database Access and Retrieval (OIDAR) services, not Information Technology Software Services (ITSS), because third-party content is stored, managed and delivered from the appellant&#039;s servers to callers via integration with telecom MSCs. Services routed from the appellant&#039;s GNOC in India are taxable in India and do not qualify as exports for 01.07.2012-31.07.2016; supplies to Jammu &amp; Kashmir and foreign branches (where data retrieval emanates from India) are therefore within taxable territory. The extended limitation was not invoked; no suppression to evade duty was found. Tax liability is confirmed for the normal period, penalties are not sustained, and the matter is remanded for re-determination consistent with this reasoning.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 08:17:49 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 08:17:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=863953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellant&#039;s ring-back tone service held OIDAR, taxable domestically for 01.07.2012-31.07.2016; liability confirmed, penalties vacated, remanded for re-determination.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94082</link>
      <description>CESTAT held that the appellant&#039;s ring-back tone service constitutes Online Information Database Access and Retrieval (OIDAR) services, not Information Technology Software Services (ITSS), because third-party content is stored, managed and delivered from the appellant&#039;s servers to callers via integration with telecom MSCs. Services routed from the appellant&#039;s GNOC in India are taxable in India and do not qualify as exports for 01.07.2012-31.07.2016; supplies to Jammu &amp; Kashmir and foreign branches (where data retrieval emanates from India) are therefore within taxable territory. The extended limitation was not invoked; no suppression to evade duty was found. Tax liability is confirmed for the normal period, penalties are not sustained, and the matter is remanded for re-determination consistent with this reasoning.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 08:17:49 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>