Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The HC held that the impugned final assessment order under s.143(3) read with s.144B, the demand notice under s.156 and the penalty notice under s.274 read with s.217AAC for AY 2022-23 were vitiated by a gross violation of natural justice where the respondent afforded the assessee less than three days to file a reply. The court found a breach of the audi alteram partem principle (including the rule against bias) and concluded the petitioner was not heard before passing the assessment. The HC quashed and set aside the impugned orders and allowed the assessee's appeal.
The HC held that the impugned final assessment order under s.143(3) read with s.144B, the demand notice under s.156 and the penalty notice under s.274 read with s.217AAC for AY 2022-23 were vitiated by a gross violation of natural justice where the respondent afforded the assessee less than three days to file a reply. The court found a breach of the audi alteram partem principle (including the rule against bias) and concluded the petitioner was not heard before passing the assessment. The HC quashed and set aside the impugned orders and allowed the assessee's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
