Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order, demand notice, and penalty notice were liable to be quashed for breach of natural justice on account of inadequate time being granted to reply and absence of effective opportunity of hearing.
Analysis: The petitioner received only three days to respond to the show-cause notice, two of which were Saturday and Sunday, leaving no real opportunity to file a meaningful reply. The record did not show that the petitioner was afforded a proper hearing before the assessment was completed. In such circumstances, the requirement of audi alteram partem, which is an essential component of fair hearing, was not satisfied. The assessment, demand, and penalty consequentially could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The impugned assessment order, demand notice, and penalty notice were quashed and the matter was remanded for fresh de novo consideration after granting the petitioner an opportunity of hearing.
Ratio Decidendi: An assessment completed without giving a reasonable and effective opportunity to respond and be heard is vitiated by breach of natural justice and is liable to be set aside with remand for fresh decision.