Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
The HC allowed the petition and directed condonation of delay under section 119(2)(b) for filing the return of income, holding that refusal would cause genuine hardship and frustrate the NCLT-approved resolution plan. The court found the petitioner assumed management only after approval of the resolution plan, promptly audited accounts and filed returns, and faced administrative impediments including prior non-audit and GST cancellation (later restored). The HC emphasized that denying carry-forward rights would nullify the resolution plan binding on authorities; it did not adjudicate entitlement to losses but granted relief to effectuate the resolution process and avoid genuine hardship to the petitioner.
The HC allowed the petition and directed condonation of delay under section 119(2)(b) for filing the return of income, holding that refusal would cause genuine hardship and frustrate the NCLT-approved resolution plan. The court found the petitioner assumed management only after approval of the resolution plan, promptly audited accounts and filed returns, and faced administrative impediments including prior non-audit and GST cancellation (later restored). The HC emphasized that denying carry-forward rights would nullify the resolution plan binding on authorities; it did not adjudicate entitlement to losses but granted relief to effectuate the resolution process and avoid genuine hardship to the petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
