<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Condonation of delay under Section 119(2)(b) granted to file income return to uphold approved resolution plan</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93355</link>
    <description>The HC allowed the petition and directed condonation of delay under section 119(2)(b) for filing the return of income, holding that refusal would cause genuine hardship and frustrate the NCLT-approved resolution plan. The court found the petitioner assumed management only after approval of the resolution plan, promptly audited accounts and filed returns, and faced administrative impediments including prior non-audit and GST cancellation (later restored). The HC emphasized that denying carry-forward rights would nullify the resolution plan binding on authorities; it did not adjudicate entitlement to losses but granted relief to effectuate the resolution process and avoid genuine hardship to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2025 08:27:09 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2025 08:27:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=858528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Condonation of delay under Section 119(2)(b) granted to file income return to uphold approved resolution plan</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93355</link>
      <description>The HC allowed the petition and directed condonation of delay under section 119(2)(b) for filing the return of income, holding that refusal would cause genuine hardship and frustrate the NCLT-approved resolution plan. The court found the petitioner assumed management only after approval of the resolution plan, promptly audited accounts and filed returns, and faced administrative impediments including prior non-audit and GST cancellation (later restored). The HC emphasized that denying carry-forward rights would nullify the resolution plan binding on authorities; it did not adjudicate entitlement to losses but granted relief to effectuate the resolution process and avoid genuine hardship to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2025 08:27:09 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93355</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>