Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The HC allowed the petition and directed condonation of delay under section 119(2)(b) for filing the return of income, holding that refusal would cause genuine hardship and frustrate the NCLT-approved resolution plan. The court found the petitioner assumed management only after approval of the resolution plan, promptly audited accounts and filed returns, and faced administrative impediments including prior non-audit and GST cancellation (later restored). The HC emphasized that denying carry-forward rights would nullify the resolution plan binding on authorities; it did not adjudicate entitlement to losses but granted relief to effectuate the resolution process and avoid genuine hardship to the petitioner.
The HC allowed the petition and directed condonation of delay under section 119(2)(b) for filing the return of income, holding that refusal would cause genuine hardship and frustrate the NCLT-approved resolution plan. The court found the petitioner assumed management only after approval of the resolution plan, promptly audited accounts and filed returns, and faced administrative impediments including prior non-audit and GST cancellation (later restored). The HC emphasized that denying carry-forward rights would nullify the resolution plan binding on authorities; it did not adjudicate entitlement to losses but granted relief to effectuate the resolution process and avoid genuine hardship to the petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
