Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The HC dismissed the applicant's bail petition under the PMLA, holding that the proviso and twin conditions of Section 45 were not satisfied. On the material before the court the applicant was prima facie implicated in an organised money-laundering syndicate, with evidence of deliberate concealment and financial interlinks; statements recorded under Section 50 were held admissible for bail assessment. Applying the statutory presumption in Section 24 and precedent on socio-economic offences, the court found reasonable grounds to believe the applicant's involvement and a risk of further offending if released. Accordingly, bail was denied.
The HC dismissed the applicant's bail petition under the PMLA, holding that the proviso and twin conditions of Section 45 were not satisfied. On the material before the court the applicant was prima facie implicated in an organised money-laundering syndicate, with evidence of deliberate concealment and financial interlinks; statements recorded under Section 50 were held admissible for bail assessment. Applying the statutory presumption in Section 24 and precedent on socio-economic offences, the court found reasonable grounds to believe the applicant's involvement and a risk of further offending if released. Accordingly, bail was denied.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.