Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to regular bail under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 by satisfying the twin conditions under Section 45.
Analysis: The application arose from allegations of money laundering linked to a scheduled offence and from material gathered in investigation, including seizure of cash, gold and immovable properties, banking transactions, and statements recorded under Section 50 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The Court applied the settled principle that at the bail stage it is not required to conduct a detailed trial of the evidence, but only to assess whether there are reasonable grounds for believing that the accused is not guilty and is unlikely to commit any offence while on bail. The Court treated the Section 50 statements as admissible material for the purpose of bail and found prima facie links between the applicant, the properties, the funds, and the alleged laundering network.
Conclusion: The applicant did not satisfy the twin conditions under Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 and was not entitled to bail.
Ratio Decidendi: In bail matters under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, the Court must assess whether there are reasonable grounds for believing that the is not guilty and is unlikely to reoffend on bail, and prima facie material including statements recorded under Section 50 may be relied upon for that limited purpose.