Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the grant of bail in a serious economic offence under Section 447 of the Companies Act, 2013, read with Section 212(6)(ii), could be sustained when the High Court did not properly consider the gravity of the allegations and the settled principles governing bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Analysis: The bail regime for offences under Section 447 of the Companies Act, 2013 is subject not only to the special restriction in Section 212(6)(ii), but also to the general principles applicable under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. In cases involving grave economic offences, the nature of accusations, the magnitude of the loss, the character of the evidence, the possibility of absconding or tampering with evidence, and the larger public interest are relevant considerations. The High Court granted bail on broad probabilities and placed significant weight on the position of co-accused, without adequately addressing the seriousness of the economic offence or applying the governing bail principles with the necessary care.
Conclusion: The grant of bail was unsustainable and was set aside; the bail application was remanded to the High Court for fresh consideration in accordance with law.