Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Evidentiary presumption under Sections 24 and 45 denies bail where Section 50 statements and concealment show organized money-laundering risk

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The HC dismissed the applicant's bail petition under the PMLA, holding that the proviso and twin conditions of Section 45 were not satisfied. On the material before the court the applicant was prima facie implicated in an organised money-laundering syndicate, with evidence of deliberate concealment and financial interlinks; statements recorded under Section 50 were held admissible for bail assessment. Applying the statutory presumption in Section 24 and precedent on socio-economic offences, the court found reasonable grounds to believe the applicant's involvement and a risk of further offending if released. Accordingly, bail was denied.....