Electricity network contributions remain revenue expenditure where ownership and maintenance stay with the electricity board, supporting business prof...
The HC granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of creating fictitious firms to issue fake GST bills, charged under Section 132(1)(i) of the CGST Act and multiple IPC provisions including conspiracy, criminal breach of trust, forgery, and cheating. The court held that custodial interrogation was unnecessary as there was no risk of evidence tampering. Consequently, the bail application was allowed, directing the petitioner to surrender within four weeks. Upon surrender or arrest, the trial court was instructed to release the petitioner on bail subject to compliance with prescribed conditions.
The HC granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of creating fictitious firms to issue fake GST bills, charged under Section 132(1)(i) of the CGST Act and multiple IPC provisions including conspiracy, criminal breach of trust, forgery, and cheating. The court held that custodial interrogation was unnecessary as there was no risk of evidence tampering. Consequently, the bail application was allowed, directing the petitioner to surrender within four weeks. Upon surrender or arrest, the trial court was instructed to release the petitioner on bail subject to compliance with prescribed conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
