https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90848 The HC granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of creating fictitious firms to issue fake GST bills, charged under Section 132(1)(i) of the CGST Act and multiple IPC provisions including conspiracy, criminal breach of trust, forgery, and cheating. The court held that custodial interrogation was unnecessary as there was no risk of evidence tampering. Consequently, the bail application was allowed, directing the petitioner to surrender within four weeks. Upon surrender or arrest, the trial court was instructed to release the petitioner on bail subject to compliance with prescribed conditions. en-us Thu, 24 Jul 2025 08:40:16 +0530 Thu, 24 Jul 2025 08:40:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90848 The HC granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of creating fictitious firms to issue fake GST bills, charged under Section 132(1)(i) of the CGST Act and multiple IPC provisions including conspiracy, criminal breach of trust, forgery, and cheating. The court held that custodial interrogation was unnecessary as there was no risk of evidence tampering. Consequently, the bail application was allowed, directing the petitioner to surrender within four weeks. Upon surrender or arrest, the trial court was instructed to release the petitioner on bail subject to compliance with prescribed conditions. Highlights GST Thu, 24 Jul 2025 08:40:16 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90848