Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
The HC granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of creating fictitious firms to issue fake GST bills, charged under Section 132(1)(i) of the CGST Act and multiple IPC provisions including conspiracy, criminal breach of trust, forgery, and cheating. The court held that custodial interrogation was unnecessary as there was no risk of evidence tampering. Consequently, the bail application was allowed, directing the petitioner to surrender within four weeks. Upon surrender or arrest, the trial court was instructed to release the petitioner on bail subject to compliance with prescribed conditions.
The HC granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of creating fictitious firms to issue fake GST bills, charged under Section 132(1)(i) of the CGST Act and multiple IPC provisions including conspiracy, criminal breach of trust, forgery, and cheating. The court held that custodial interrogation was unnecessary as there was no risk of evidence tampering. Consequently, the bail application was allowed, directing the petitioner to surrender within four weeks. Upon surrender or arrest, the trial court was instructed to release the petitioner on bail subject to compliance with prescribed conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
