Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
NCLAT allowed the appeal and remanded the matter back to the Tribunal. The original order was found to be non-speaking and confusing regarding the claim's rejection, which was based on a 102-day delay in filing Form-C for outstanding dues against the Corporate Debtor. The Tribunal misapplied a precedent related to appeal delay under Section 42, failing to properly evaluate the reasons for the claim's delayed submission. The appellate tribunal directed the lower tribunal to rehear and decide the matter afresh in accordance with legal principles, ensuring a comprehensive examination of the claim's merits and delay justification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.