https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89472 NCLAT allowed the appeal and remanded the matter back to the Tribunal. The original order was found to be non-speaking and confusing regarding the claim's rejection, which was based on a 102-day delay in filing Form-C for outstanding dues against the Corporate Debtor. The Tribunal misapplied a precedent related to appeal delay under Section 42, failing to properly evaluate the reasons for the claim's delayed submission. The appellate tribunal directed the lower tribunal to rehear and decide the matter afresh in accordance with legal principles, ensuring a comprehensive examination of the claim's merits and delay justification. en-us Tue, 17 Jun 2025 07:57:58 +0530 Tue, 17 Jun 2025 07:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89472 NCLAT allowed the appeal and remanded the matter back to the Tribunal. The original order was found to be non-speaking and confusing regarding the claim's rejection, which was based on a 102-day delay in filing Form-C for outstanding dues against the Corporate Debtor. The Tribunal misapplied a precedent related to appeal delay under Section 42, failing to properly evaluate the reasons for the claim's delayed submission. The appellate tribunal directed the lower tribunal to rehear and decide the matter afresh in accordance with legal principles, ensuring a comprehensive examination of the claim's merits and delay justification. Highlights IBC Tue, 17 Jun 2025 07:57:58 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89472