Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
The AT affirmed the Provisional Attachment Order (PAO) in a money laundering case involving illegal wildlife trade and ivory trafficking. The tribunal held that properties acquired prior to the criminal offense can be attached when proceeds of crime are unavailable or partially traceable. In this instance, the appellant's involvement was established through ivory recovery, statements under Section 50 of PMLA, 2002, and prima facie evidence of criminal proceeds exceeding Rs. 120 lakhs. The tribunal concluded that the appellant was guilty under Section 3 of PMLA, 2002, and confirmed the attachment of equivalent property value. The appeal was consequently dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.