<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Provisional Attachment Order Upheld in Wildlife Trafficking Case: Property Seizure Confirmed Despite Partial Proceeds Traceability</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88933</link>
    <description>The AT affirmed the Provisional Attachment Order (PAO) in a money laundering case involving illegal wildlife trade and ivory trafficking. The tribunal held that properties acquired prior to the criminal offense can be attached when proceeds of crime are unavailable or partially traceable. In this instance, the appellant&#039;s involvement was established through ivory recovery, statements under Section 50 of PMLA, 2002, and prima facie evidence of criminal proceeds exceeding Rs. 120 lakhs. The tribunal concluded that the appellant was guilty under Section 3 of PMLA, 2002, and confirmed the attachment of equivalent property value. The appeal was consequently dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2025 08:47:04 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 May 2025 08:47:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=825814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Provisional Attachment Order Upheld in Wildlife Trafficking Case: Property Seizure Confirmed Despite Partial Proceeds Traceability</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88933</link>
      <description>The AT affirmed the Provisional Attachment Order (PAO) in a money laundering case involving illegal wildlife trade and ivory trafficking. The tribunal held that properties acquired prior to the criminal offense can be attached when proceeds of crime are unavailable or partially traceable. In this instance, the appellant&#039;s involvement was established through ivory recovery, statements under Section 50 of PMLA, 2002, and prima facie evidence of criminal proceeds exceeding Rs. 120 lakhs. The tribunal concluded that the appellant was guilty under Section 3 of PMLA, 2002, and confirmed the attachment of equivalent property value. The appeal was consequently dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2025 08:47:04 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>