SEZ-unit profit deduction covers voluntary transfer-pricing adjustments, while exempt-income costs, foreign-exchange loss and ITeS comparables are exa...
Infrastructure-development deduction remains available to EPC contractors when substantive statutory conditions outweigh contractor labels in agreemen...
ITAT adjudicated a dispute involving an Asset Reconstruction Company's tax treatment of security receipts. The tribunal held that the assessee correctly followed RBI guidelines by writing off unrealized security receipts after eight years. The ITAT rejected the AO's assessment that trust realizations constituted the assessee's income, drawing parallels with mutual fund investments. The tribunal found no infirmity in the assessee's accounting methodology and directed deletion of protective additions related to upside income. Consequently, the ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming the assessee's tax treatment of security receipts and rejecting unauthorized income additions by the tax authorities.
ITAT adjudicated a dispute involving an Asset Reconstruction Company's tax treatment of security receipts. The tribunal held that the assessee correctly followed RBI guidelines by writing off unrealized security receipts after eight years. The ITAT rejected the AO's assessment that trust realizations constituted the assessee's income, drawing parallels with mutual fund investments. The tribunal found no infirmity in the assessee's accounting methodology and directed deletion of protective additions related to upside income. Consequently, the ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming the assessee's tax treatment of security receipts and rejecting unauthorized income additions by the tax authorities.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
