Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The NCLAT dismissed an appeal challenging procedural aspects of liquidator fee determination without contesting the Stakeholders' Consultation Committee's (SCC) actual decision on the matter. The Tribunal held that challenging the procedure without challenging the consequential decision rendered the appeal premature and untenable. The appellant had questioned the Adjudicating Authority's directive for the SCC to determine liquidator remuneration and incidental charges, but failed to challenge the SCC's subsequent decision dated 09.01.2025. The NCLAT concluded that no cause survived regarding the impugned order's directions, as the unchallenged SCC determination had already addressed the liquidator's fees and liquidation costs.
The NCLAT dismissed an appeal challenging procedural aspects of liquidator fee determination without contesting the Stakeholders' Consultation Committee's (SCC) actual decision on the matter. The Tribunal held that challenging the procedure without challenging the consequential decision rendered the appeal premature and untenable. The appellant had questioned the Adjudicating Authority's directive for the SCC to determine liquidator remuneration and incidental charges, but failed to challenge the SCC's subsequent decision dated 09.01.2025. The NCLAT concluded that no cause survived regarding the impugned order's directions, as the unchallenged SCC determination had already addressed the liquidator's fees and liquidation costs.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.